Categories
In Rainbows Radiohead

Nigel Godrich on “Nude”

godrich200.jpgThere’s an excellent article from Word Magazine with Radiohead’s “unofficial 6th man” and long-time producer, Nigel Godrich. Nigel is featured in an article called “The Music Producers” and he explains the very long, but amazing, history of “Nude.”

Nigel Godrich On NUDE by Radiohead (2007)

Nigel Godrich started out at RAK Studios, where he engineered Carnival Of Light by Ride and The Bends by Radiohead. He has produced Radiohead’s last four albums, and has also worked with Travis, Paul McCartney (Chaos And Creation In The Back Yard) and on Beck’s last three albums. He remixed U2’s Walk On and produced Band Aid 20’s Do They Know It’s Christmas?

Thom’s very prolific, he’s always writing, and one time I made a list of songs that he had that they hadn’t recorded. Radiohead have a little catalogue of songs that just never get done. It’s almost because it’s their best material and no version is ever quite good enough. It’s too precious to them. I said, “You have to record them, because one day you’re going to die and they’ll go with you. It’s criminal. And if you don’t fucking record them, I’m going to fucking do it! I’ll do a covers album!” And Nude was one of these songs.

After The Bends was all done and dusted, I’d seen them at a show and they said they’d been thinking about us all working together. We’d done a bunch of B-sides on The Bends and it had gone really well, so we hatched a plan to have a couple of little try-outs to see how it would work.

We booked a weekend in the studio to start recording what would become OK Computer, although it took a long time to really get into that. We recorded two songs; one was called Big Boots – actually, it was called Man O’ War at the time, which is another great lost Radiohead classic. The other thing we tried to record was a song called Nude. Thom had just written it and it was almost a different song to the version on In Rainbows. It’s recognisable, but it had different lyrics and it was a lot straighter. The idea was for it to be like an Al Green track. It had a Hammond going through it on the version we recorded that weekend. They liked it, it was deemed a great success. But then for some reason everyone went off it. We tried to record it a couple more times for OK Computer, probably about three times for Kid A and another three times for Hail To The Thief. But somehow it had gone.

We had a little holiday from each other. The band tried to record on their own, which – surprise, surprise – didn’t work. Then they tried working with someone else, which also didn’t work. During that time I went to see Colin, the bass player, and he played me a rough live version of Nude that they’d done in rehearsals. He’d written his new bassline, which transformed it from something very straight into something that had much more of a rhythmic flow. The chorus had been taken out – very Radiohead! – and there was this new vocal break and this new end section. It sounded like they were somehow terrified playing it, but it sounded OK. We recorded it three times and the final one – which we did in their house and then overdubbed in Covent Garden – is what you hear today.

Finally, for some inexplicable reason, it made it out! With Radiohead we always say, “It doesn’t matter how we get there, as long as we end up at the right place,” but actually I think the real skill is being able to recognise something that lands on your lap and is fully formed and wonderful. A big part of my job is trying to persuade Thom that just because this thing happened very quickly, it doesn’t mean it’s not great. He doesn’t understand what it is about what he does that’s great. He doesn’t know or understand where it comes from.

Songs have a kind of window where they are really most alive – and you have to capture it. Nude missed its window, and it took a lot of reinvention to bring it back to the place where we could capture it again in a way that resonated for the people playing it. It was essentially the same song; nothing had really changed. What has changed are the people playing it.

Categories
In Rainbows Jonny Greenwood Phil Selway Radiohead

Radiohead on CNN.com

There is a lengthy article/interview with the band on cnn.com for your reading pleasure.
Here’s a bit:

As unified as “In Rainbows” sounds, it took years to complete. The band began recording it with producer Mark Stent, the first time in years they didn’t work with Nigel Godrich.

The attempt was futile and Radiohead set out on tour to help bring the new songs into shape. When they returned to the studio, they went back to Godrich, considered the unofficial sixth member because of his importance in helping refine the group’s sound. (Colin calls his wealth of gear “like Aladdin’s cave.”)

“The key thing in actually propelling it forward was Nigel coming back into the process,” said Selway, 41. “The reality when we got in there was it still wasn’t good enough. We really had to raise our standards quite a lot.”

Typically, songs begin with Yorke writing something on piano or guitar with vocals and fleshing it out with the multi-instrumentalist Jonny Greenwood. Then the band works together to find the right arrangement, a process that can be tortuous. “Videotape” underwent, Yorke jokes, hundreds of versions before finding the right minimalist sound.

“We still sometimes get overawed by the songs,” said Greenwood. “We’ll get very attached to a song as an idea in its very basic form, but we also know we can’t really leave it like that. So that’s what we spend our time talking about and planning and thinking about. Thom will sit and play ‘Pyramid Song’ on piano, for example, and it’s obviously not finished. It needs a rhythm to propel it along. But what do you do with it and yet not mess it up? So that’s the sort of enjoyable pressure we like to be under.”

Though the method of release overshadowed the music of “In Rainbows” somewhat, it’s been almost universally hailed as a masterpiece. Yorke has been quoted as calling it “our classic album, our ‘Transformer,’ our ‘Revolver,’ our ‘Hunky Dory’ ” — a statement he said is a misquote: “I do talk some … but I didn’t say that.”

His point, he said, is that they strove to make a similarly concise work as those albums.

Read the rest….
(thanks to Alex)

Categories
Colin Greenwood Ed O'Brien Jonny Greenwood Phil Selway Radiohead Thom Yorke

Excellent Radiohead Interview from Word Magazine

Word MagazineIf you get a chance, check out this great interview The Word did with the band. Here’s a snippet:

What do people most often get wrong about Radiohead?

Thom Yorke: We play up to the tortuous thing a bit too much. It’s not quite like that in the band. But also, this idea that there’s some sort of masterplan, that we’ve got some sort of clue what we’re doing… We haven’t.

Ed O’Brien: I used to think that maybe people didn’t know that there’s actually a great sense of humour in the band. But maybe the webcasts and a few of the things we did last year show that we’re not entirely super-serious all the time. You can’t do what we do without humour. It’s a lot easier to be melancholic in music. We struggle with songs of joy. That’s the tough part.

Phil Selway: People have got a pretty accurate take on us, I think. It can be uncomfortable because some of those takes are less than flattering, but they’re probably valid. You know, po-faced and over-serious… fair point, really. People are starting to pick up on the more playful side of Radiohead, which we hope has come to the fore in the past few years but, you know, no smoke without fire.

Jonny Greenwood: That we’re grumpy. People confuse the work with the people who make it. We’re not necessarily like our songs. Also I think they misunderstand Thom, and how really tiresomely energetic and enthusiastic he can be. Even when the rest of us are flagging, he’s the one with the energy and the excitement who’s saying, “Come on, this sounds amazing, what you’re doing is great.” That’s really good for us and I don’t think anyone knows it.
Read the rest…

Categories
Ed O'Brien Radiohead The King of Limbs

Back in the studio sooner than you think

Ed told the BBC that the band plans on going back in to the studio and recording again this October after the tour wraps up.

He told Newsbeat: “It’s the life blood of what we do, it’s the thing that keeps you going.

“Because by the end of the tour, you’re bored of what you’re playing.

“You need more life and energy and the only way to do that is writing new songs.”

Sadly for fans, O’Brien won’t be pushed on when the new songs are likely to be unveiled.

He said: “It could be five years, it could be the end of this year, it’s whether it’s any good, that’s the point.

“We’ve just got to do it and see if it’s any good.”
Read the full article here.

Categories
Ed O'Brien In Rainbows Radiohead Thom Yorke tour

Ed and Thom on BBC 6 Music, talk about In Rainbows and touring

radio205x150.jpgIf you missed Ed and Thom on Steve Lamacq’s BBC 6 Music program, don’t worry! You can listen to it by clicking this link. You’ll need RealPlayer, though.

Some highlights:
– Thom being asked what he did the day the album was released online: “I seem to remember sitting at home thinking there’s something I’m supposed to be doing today. I didn’t do anything that day.”

– Thom and Ed talk about how they recorded part of In Rainbows in a dilapidated mansion and slept in caravans on the grounds. Nigel wanted to throw the band “in an uncomfortable” situation. “Bodysnatchers” was recorded in a live take there.

– Nigel limited the band to about 15 or 16 songs to focus on to record.

– Thom on why “Reckoner” is completely different than the live version: “Because it’s not the same song. There was a song called Reckoner. I wrote a second part to it and then Jonny wrote another part to it and the song as it was left the building.”

– Thom on why “Nude” took so long to be released: “I think it’s because I used to hate the way I sung it.”

– “Down is the New Up” is described as “mental” by Thom. “Wait till you hear it.” He really wanted it to be on the album but according to Ed, it didn’t fit.

– Thom talked about all the “mad theories on the net”, specifically about the theory of 10s.

– Ed remarked that he was happy that Thom’s voice on In Rainbows was upfront and not “pulled back.”

– If they could relive one Radiohead moment again, both Thom and Ed would relive Glastonbury 1997 where the lights and PAs blew up.

– Speaking of Glastonbury, it sounds like they may be playing it this year if “they want us.”

– Though not finalized or confirmed, they may be playing the US for a couple of weeks starting in May. Europe would follow in June/July. Again, nothing is confirmed!

Categories
In Rainbows Radiohead

Ask Radiohead a question

Is there something you would like to ask Radiohead? Well, here’s your chance. We were contacted by a journalist in the UK who is interviewing Radiohead next week for the December issue of Observer Music Monthly. He would like you, the fans, to ask the questions.

Dear Green Plastic readers,

My name is Craig McLean and I’m a journalist in the UK. next week i’m interviewing Radiohead for the December issue of the Observer Music Monthly. in the spirit of In Rainbows, i would like to have the fans ask the questions.

if you have a question you’d like me to put to the band, whether related to In Rainbows or something else, please could you email it to OMM@observer.co.uk by Friday 16th November, midday GMT. please put ‘Radiohead Question’ in the subject box. please also supply your name, age, location (in the world) and – if you don’t mind – the sum you paid for In Rainbows and a one-sentence/one-line explanation as to why you paid that sum, and/or one line with your thoughts on the whole In Rainbows initiative. i will ask the band the most interesting/intriguing questions submitted by fans.

many thanks for your help, and best wishes.
craig mclean”